Buy photos

Fraud

Pandemic preparedness
Last updated: Wed. Mar. 10, 2010 - 10:16 am EDT Bookmark and Share Subscribe RSS   E-mail

VIEW
Officer injured as traffic stop escalates to violence
Patrolman attacked by boy not involved in stop.
of The News-Sentinel

A Fort Wayne Police officer was beaten by a “mouthy” juvenile Monday during a traffic stop.

Officer Stephen Ealing, a patrolman of just over a year, was admitted to Parkview Hospital for upper-body injuries sustained when he was allegedly attacked by a boy during a traffic stop on the city's southeast side.

Ealing had pulled over two youths on a mo-ped near the intersection of Hessen Cassel Road and Ashcroft Drive just before 5 p.m. when a group of four approached and began talking to the suspects, according to Officer Deborah Joyner's incident report. When Ealing told the group to back away until he was finished with the stop, a juvenile in the group yelled at him, “(expletive) you,” Joyner wrote.

Ealing told Joyner the boy was “mouthy” as Ealing turned his attention toward him and demanded identification. The boy refused, Ealing said, and Ealing instructed the boy to put his hands on the car, Joyner wrote.

As Ealing was patting the boy down, Ealing told Joyner the boy elbowed him in the mouth, the report said.

Ealing then called for backup and pepper-sprayed the boy, sending him face-down to the ground, the report said. As Ealing was attempting to handcuff the boy, however, he rose with Ealing on his back. The boy then lifted Ealing over his head and tossed him head-first onto the road, the report said.

The group fled, leaving Ealing struggling to breathe and bleeding from the back of his head, Joyner wrote.

One of the boys on the mo-ped told police it was his brother who assaulted Ealing and provided officers with his home address.

As Ealing was being transported to Parkview Hospital, police went to a home on Sherrill Drive, two blocks east of the incident. The boy's mother told officers she did not know her son's whereabouts, but officers found the boy inside the home.

The boy ran from officers but was apprehended quickly. Officers did use a Taser on the boy twice before he could be handcuffed and arrested, a report said.

The News-Sentinel is not identifying the boy because he is a juvenile. He was taken to the Allen County Juvenile Center on unknown charges.

Ealing was released Monday from Parkview Hospital. Police spokeswoman Raquel Foster said Tuesday that Ealing suffered injuries to his shoulder and ribs during the incident, but could not comment on the severity of the injuries.

On Ealing's Facebook page, though, the officer said he had a broken clavicle and four broken ribs.

On Tuesday, Ealing expressed gratitude to his fellow officers for coming to his aid and for arresting the suspect. “Thanks to my great co-workers for their quick response to my call for help and for finding the young man who left me in the street with a broken clavicle and four broken ribs,” Ealing wrote. “You guys really are the best in the business!”

Discuss this article!
(Requires free news-sentinel.com registration.)

Note:The News-Sentinel reserves the right to remove any content appearing on its Web site. Our policy will be to remove postings that constitute profanity, obscenity, libel, spam, invasion of privacy, impersonation of another, or attacks on racial, ethnic or other groups.. For more information, see our user rules page.

Posted by Michael Kerney on 03/12/10 08:49:00 AM (Suggest removal)
  • @Robert
I don't hate the FWPD at all. That's your assumption.

Please, if you have any comments on the facts of my statements or the story, feel free to make them, but I don't see where your attacking me personally is relevant or called for.


Posted by Robert J. on 03/12/10 02:26:00 AM (Suggest removal)
  • Traffic Stop
Mr. Kerney,

I can tell from your tone you are not a fan of the FWPD. Usually when people have this tone on here they have been arrested before and have a problem with that. [Text removed by editor.]


Posted by Michael Kerney on 03/11/10 01:27:00 PM (Suggest removal)
  • @Cindy
OK, let's break that down.

"I would venture to guess that if the police officer had ignored the moped riders"

He didn't ignore the moped riders. Until...

"along with the 'mouthy boy'"

He chose to turn his attention to the "mouthy boy" when he decided he wouldn't let him get away with being "mouthy"

"and violence had happened"

Which didn't happen until the *officer* started throwing his weight around

"with bystanders on the street,"

I think you mean the people who were there and the officer didn't engage, and apparently wasn't threatened by

"we'd hear people asking why no police officers were there to control things."

Well, that's theoretical, but in actual situation at hand we might ask why the officer didn't call backup sooner. Here you're almost kind of right, but not really for the reason you might have thought.

"Any 'boy' who yells profanity at a police officer, then assaults him and has his mommy helping him avoid arrest is a 'boy' that I personally would prefer the police officers keep off the streets."

Except yelling isn't illegal, and if he actually did do something illegal, why didn't Joyner say so?

"Ealing told Joyner the boy was “mouthy” as Ealing turned his attention toward him and demanded identification. The boy refused, Ealing said, and Ealing instructed the boy to put his hands on the car, Joyner wrote."

Like I said, "mouthy" isn't illegal, and just because an officer demands identification doesn't necessarily mean you have to give it, in every situation. It seems odd that if there was a reasonable suspicion of a crime about to be or a crime committed, Joyner didn't just say what that was.

(note: you might want to google the phrase "contempt of cop" and see what you get.)

And on the other hand, you could also say that any officer that decides to push people around just because they say things he doesn't like shouldn't be on the streets.


Posted by Cindylou1994 on 03/11/10 11:15:00 AM (Suggest removal)
  • mouthy boy
I would venture to guess that if the police officer had ignored the moped riders along with the 'mouthy boy' and violence had happened with bystanders on the street, we'd hear people asking why no police officers were there to control things. Any 'boy' who yells profanity at a police officer, then assaults him and has his mommy helping him avoid arrest is a 'boy' that I personally would prefer the police officers keep off the streets.


Posted by Michael Kerney on 03/11/10 07:49:00 AM (Suggest removal)
  • @msf well, seriously...
"The situation escalated as the young man refused to cooperate."

Putting aside for a moment whether the boy was actually required to cooperate (lawful order versus request) according to the story we have...

The officer chose to let the boy's yelling get to him.

The officer chose to drop his stop at hand to confront the boy and escalate.

The officer chose not to call or wait for backup before doing this.

The officer chose to wait until the boy resisted the frisk to even call for backup.

The officer chose all of this. He let the boy get to him by being "mouthy" and he escalated with no backup in sight. This is all aside from whether or not his detention of the boy was lawful. If he had no legal basis for that detention, it just makes the injuries he suffered even more not worth it.


Posted by Michael Kerney on 03/11/10 07:03:00 AM (Suggest removal)
  • @msf
Well, yelling profanities isn't illegal. You'll note that the story doesn't actually say the boy refused to back away - simply that he was "mouthy."

We're only obligated to follow *lawful* orders of police officers. You don't have to necessarily do just anything an officer says, and they have to follow the law as well. Under the law, you're not required to produce identification unless you're being lawfully detained. You might want to look into Terry Stop and stop and identify.

If we give up our rights under the law, we really do "kiss our protections goodbye."


Posted by msf on 03/10/10 11:57:00 PM (Suggest removal)
  • Seriously?
Let me get this straight: When you read this story, the things that bothered some of you are that the poor juvenile -- you know, the one that beat up on a police officer -- was approached by the officer in the first place, and that the reporter used the word "boy" too many times? Really??

Since the reporter was respectfully not naming the juvenile, he had to refer to him with some other noun. He wasn't 18, so he couldn't be called "man," and "juvenile" is even more cumbersome than "boy." "Child" is too young, and "kid" is too informal. What would you have liked him to say?

The boy was yelling profanities at the officer and refusing to back away so that he could conduct his initial business (with the moped). You don't think this merits a simple request for ID? That's all the officer initially asked for. The situation escalated as the young man refused to cooperate. Are we only obligated to follow police officers' instructions and obey the laws when we feel like it? Think about what you're suggesting. If citizens have no respect for authority, you may as well kiss those laws -- our protections -- goodbye.


Posted by Robert J. on 03/10/10 06:38:00 PM (Suggest removal)
  • traffic stop
6'6" 225 pound boy. The news sentinel reporter seemed to enjoy using the word boy in his article to the tune of 16 times. Another well researched story by this writer. If this writer has enough time to go to the officer's facebook page he should have enough time to complete his story with the facts. Like how big this 'boy' would have been to assault a police officer.


Posted by Michael Kerney on 03/10/10 04:56:00 PM (Suggest removal)
  • @Barbara
Well, she's a MOM. Protecting one's own child is kind of human nature. Considering the beating the officer took, something tells me the officers that showed up weren't in the best of moods. I'm not sure it's reasonable to even expect someone to simply switch off maternal instinct.

In any case, we haven't established for certain that the kid's detention was lawful in the first place. We don't know for sure now, I doubt she knew then.


Posted by Michael Kerney on 03/10/10 04:49:00 PM (Suggest removal)
  • Not the stop, Zorro
"when a group of four approached and began talking to the suspects, according to Officer Deborah Joyner's incident report. When Ealing told the group to back away until he was finished with the stop, a juvenile in the group yelled at him, “(expletive) you,” Joyner wrote."

The kid that broke him wasn't on the moped.

The officer could have ignored the comment, or at least waited for backup, but he apparently chose to engage the kid for it all on his own.

And if speaking rudely was all the reason the officer had to go after the kid on, he didn't have Terry Stop grounds... we'll see.


Posted by Robert J. on 03/10/10 04:26:00 PM (Suggest removal)
  • Reason for stop
Mr. Kerney,

It is against the law to ride double on a moped in the state of Indiana therefore the stop.


Posted by Barbara Brown on 03/10/10 03:52:00 PM (Suggest removal)
  • Lack of Responsibility and Respect
So when the police go to the home of the "boy" the parent lies and hides him from the police instead of teaching him to respect others and take responsibility for his actions. So wonder there is so much trouble with these young kids today. Especially in certain areas of town moreso than in other areas. Teach your child respect and responsibility and maybe the police won't be knocking at your door looking for him!!


Posted by Michael Kerney on 03/10/10 01:41:00 PM (Suggest removal)
  • (No heading)
He's a "boy" until 18, blame the AP stylebook.

"Ealing told Joyner the boy was “mouthy” as Ealing turned his attention toward him and demanded identification. The boy refused, Ealing said, and Ealing instructed the boy to put his hands on the car, Joyner wrote."

Last I checked "mouthy" wasn't against the law. Short of reasonable suspicion of a crime being or about to be committed, did the officer even have Terry Stop grounds?


Posted by Robert J. on 03/10/10 11:20:00 AM (Suggest removal)
  • Attack
The reporter fails to mention the ago of the boy or his physical dimensions. When I think of the word boy I think of my 8 year old son. The report seems to like to report the word 'boy' several times. Hmmmm.



  Stock Sponsor
© 2010 - The News-Sentinel, all rights reserved